Wednesday, December 19, 2018

Wet Plate Collodion 11x14 Petzval 3-Lens Test

Dallmeyer 3A 16in f4.0, Wollensak Vitax #5 16in f3.8, Dallmeyer 4B 17in f3.7

  Having very recently completed the adapter for my Century #2 11x14 camera to have a spring back for standard plate holders, I thought I’d make this post for the sake of posterity.  There’s a lot of talk nowadays about Petzvals and a lot of folks I see are looking for proper ones for their 11x14 cameras.  It’s not often that above three lenses find themselves in each other’s company, and so I have never seen a real side by comparison done in controlled environment.

  Very briefly, I must state that technically for a ‘large head’ cropping as seen below, on 11x14 camera a truly correct lens to use would be of at least 20in focal length to avoid possible distortion of the nose when shooting this close.  17in is a ‘normal’ focal length for 11x14 format, of course as you rack it out your plate sees less and sell from its angle of coverage, so the lens becomes de facto ‘longer’, but 17in is still not enough.  In old times of proper photography, 24+in lenses were recommended for 11x14 format, but I can’t blame folks for shooting round 17in on 11x14 since any Petzval of 20in focal length and above is going to cost about as much as some new cars today…  
These plates were shot at 1:1 ratio, so head of model on plate is same as in real life.   I'm not going to go into how effective aperture changes with bellows draw, that's for another time.
Fred the neighbor was as always kind enough to sit in for the sake of art and science.
Oh…  On the plate made with the Vitax I think I forgot to turn one of the light back toward Fred, so lighting is a bit different there, but that doesn’t really affect what we’re looking at to much.

  Controls for the test were as follows.  Lighting was provided by flash to eliminate possibility or motion blur.  To keep the focal plane right on the eye between final check of focus and exposure, an International Head Brace was used, these things are great whether you’re shooting continuous light or flash and I rarely go without it.  Collodion and developer formulas matter little, as does the fact that I barely cleaned the glass after pulling it out of the box, just dusted it off and that’s it.  This isn’t a test of how clean of a plate yours truly can pour, and I used glass so I can erase these images later…  Development was carried out by visual inspection. Plates were copied on a Polaroid MP4 copy stand via Canon 5DII and 24-105L lens at f11.  Equal amount of sharpening was given in Photoshop as standard procedure (100% at 1 pixel radius and 0 tolerance).

  In interest of full disclosure – the glass on both 3A and Vitax is as good as it can be for 100+ year old lenses, while the 4A I have actually suffers from previous mistreatment, leaving it with a few significant scratches on back element and separation around the edge of front pair…  I think the below results do show that, despite the flaws in glass, the image from it suffers very little if any at all.

Full 11x14 plates

Dallmeyer 4B

Dallmeyer 3A

Vitax #5

Closeups of same plates
(copy camera lowered)

Dallmeyer 4B

Dallmeyer 3A

Vitax #5

Left eye from all three plates
(shot in macro range and cropped again in PS)

   Personally I can barely tell them apart.  Dallmeyers seem to have a tiny bit of softness to then, which is really nice for skin smoothness. Vitax though seems to have more contrast, and I like that in my plates (though that can really be due to me switching lighting to higher ratio).  Above copies will likely appear much larger on your screen than in real life, so I would encourage you to think about that as you’re thinking about this – in reality, the eye in last photo is same as your eye size, so shrink the picture down to until that is the case and then think if you’d be able to tell the difference in sharpness at that scale.  Pretty sure that in competent hands any one of these lenses is able to wow customers and viewers if one is not picking apart details and doesn’t have another plate of same subject made with a different lens…    


Thursday, November 1, 2018

To Rocks And Trees, Visual Ode In 45 Wet Plate Collodion Movements

  One of the professors at my junior college didn’t think much of landscape photography.  I think it was the commercial photography guy.  He categorized work from the likes of Carlton Watkins, Ansel Adams and Clyde Butcher simply as ‘rocks and trees’.  Here come more rocks and trees, he would say when seeing someone carefully matting their newest enlargement of a forest.   I didn’t take those underhanded jabs too close to my heart.  Internally, I knew that rocks and trees are as important, if not more so, than the latest cover of Vogue or Interior Design Digest.  I also knew that, in order for nature to present itself in a two-dimensional form afforded by photography as more than just rocks and trees, within the photographer there had to be a deeper connection formed to both nature and the craft of image-making.  Over the following 20 years, I’ve continued to practice landscape photography and also made countless trips to the wilderness for prolonged periods of time in order to train the eye and mind to see nature at its best.
  Earlier this year, having now practiced wet plate collodion for over 5 years, I decided to make a special trip aboard The Photo Palace Bus in order to create a visual ode to the rocks and trees so disregarded by my old professor.  There was no real road map for the trip.  I stayed on the western side of United States as I’ve done a fair amount of traveling before and this part of the country always inspired me more.  There’s a lot that’s on the way when you go from San Diego to North Dakota and back, so 8 National Parks, 4 National Monuments, and uncounted number of National Forests and State Parks were visited.  6000 miles were driven, and most of them were along small highways, running through some beautiful back-country of what used to be wild west (and it still really feels like it in some parts).  I made stops whenever inspired by light or a particular scene and made a total of around 130 tintypes and ambrotypes varying in size from 4x5 to 8x10in (with very few 8x20in as well).  From those, 45  images were selected as movements for this visual ode.  Calling them ‘movements’ makes sense to me on various levels.  Elements in natural scenes to me resemble notes on a page, carefully arranged to make each final composition sing its own unique song.  Movement is also what one does a lot while making location tintypes. Going into details of physical tribulations required for creations of each plate here would take up too much of my readers’ time, but I’ll just say that some of the acrobatics performed with an 8x10 camera over the shoulder, and the many sprints back and forth over the slippery river boulders or over fallen branches big and small, while carrying a loaded holder to and from the camera were rather challenging.
  It was all worth it though.  It was all for the glory of rocks and trees. 

*To order prints of any images you see here, please see details at the bottom of this post 
*Plates below are presented with no titles or sizes attached in order to better distill their visual impact.  Prints will have original plate size and location listed in back along with signature and edition number. 














































  Presented above are the plates that will be kept in my archive.  Please feel free to contact me about signed and numbered limited edition high resolution archival prints on cotton rag fine art paper, which are available to be made from any images in this post.  Prints will be made on demand in maximum number of 10 prints of any size from each image.  Sizes available are standard 8x10, 11x14, 16x20, and 20x24. 

Prints can be ordered via email only –  

When sending email, please let me know the number you see under the image(s) you'd like to have print(s) of, and the size(s) you'd like to have made. 

Print prices (including worldwide shipping):
8x10in - $115
11x14in - $145
16x20in - $185
20x24in - $245

  Thank you,